Why condensed matter physicists don’t like ArXiv? May 14, 2007Posted by apetrov in Physics, Science.
If you think that once you get your tenure your can stop writing and updating your CV, you are very wrong. And it has nothing to do with moving to another university or getting a position at the national lab. Every year you have to submit your Professional Record (university-standartized CV) at least once (if you are a Full Professor) or twice (if you are an Associate Professor) to a bunch of committes. One reason is cool cash — aka salary considerations. Another one — promotion. Maybe in other places people do it once a year, but WSU likes to produce a separate paper trail. And this means that, among other things, you have to report your publications. Not a big deal, if you really want to stick to work already published in a journal. But it usually takes months to actually publish a paper… and by that time you might already have a couple of things that you finished and submitted to a journal. How do you report those? Well, one way is to report them as “submitted to…” But how do you prove to higher-ups (there are at least three committes that oversee this process on the dept., college and university levels) that this paper was really finished and submitted?
As I could see particle/astro/nuclear types had no problem with that, they’d always supply the ArXiv numbers for their preprints. Nice and convenient. But what I noticed is that with the exception of two or three guys, no condensed matter/atomic physicist supplied those. Simply because they don’t use ArXiv. Why? That is the question I wanted to ask my colleagues in the department.
The answers ranged from “it’s just not popular among CM physicists” and “we don’t want our competitors to know what we are doing before publication” to “many CM physicists don’t use latex, so there is some difficulty in submitting papers to ArXiv” and “Science and Nature consider a paper submitted to ArXiv as published, so they would not publish anything that is already on the Web.” I was very surprized by the last statement. I don’t have a reason to publish in those journals, so I don’t know the specifics… but I always thought that ArXiv is just a nice and welcome evolution of the old system of mass-mailing of institutional preprints so papers submitted there are just what they are, preprints…
Maybe there are other reasons why CP matter physicists don’t like ArXiv? Would be nice to know…
BTW, I have a respectable well-cited paper that was never submitted to any journal (see here). Why? I don’t know… I should ask my collaborator… Should I count it as a publication?