Impressions of ArXiv identifiers and other random news

It’s been a month since ArXiv.org, one of the main sources of information for particle, nuclear, astro and other physicists implemented new scheme to identify papers submitted there (and two weeks since my last post — finals as well as other matters). I guess the big idea behind changing the old scheme, when papers were identified by topic, year, month, and a number, say, arch-ive/YYMMNNN, to a new one was that the old one was not good enough for computers (as it was fine for most of the humans I know who use the archive). For example, it used to be that paper identified as hep-ph/0610039 simply meant that the paper in High Energy Physics – PHenomenology was submitted to archive in October 2006 and identified as paper number 39. The new scheme assigns identifiers as arXiv:YYMM.NNNNvV (see here for explanation of ArXiv labelling scheme). I wonder that if the new scheme is better for automatic classification, what was the point of introducing it at all, and not, say switch to DOI (Digital Object Identifier) numbers… In other words, I don’t know what subject class this paper belongs to just by looking at the archive number. Of course, this is not a big deal, as I can always download a paper and look to see what it is about, but for my colleague, say in Irkutsk, who sits on a modem line and pays for service by kilobyte, it might not be that easy…

I must however add that I think that along with SLAC SPIRES, the ArXiv is one of the best inventions that made life of particle physicist easier — no more preprint mailings and “manual” library searches. Kinda like moving from paper newspapers to online ones. It might be interesting to find out if the idea of on-line versions of newspapers (say, New York Times) was invented by newspapers or “modeled after” phsyics preprint servers such as ArXiv. Might be another thing for physicists to be proud about…