jump to navigation

Nobel talk September 29, 2006

Posted by apetrov in Uncategorized.
trackback

2006 Nobel Prize in physics will be awarded on Oct. 3 — just in a couple of days. Of course, there is already an active discussion in blogosphere about who should get it. In fact , Thompson Scientific (yes, publisher of our algebra-based General Physics textbook) has a poll with the following results:

49% – Desurvire, Nakazawa, Payne (condensed matter: fiber optics)
32% – Fert, Gruenberg (condensed matter: giant magnetoresistance)
20% – Guth, Linde, Steinhardt (cosmology: inflation)

Although I think that this year it’ll go to someone more “applied” (which would make contestant number 2 above the most likely candidate), I can suggest a couple of candidates in particle/nuclear physics:

  • Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, and maybe Nicola Cabibbo for mechanism of CP-violation in the Standard Model;
  • Yoishiro Nambu and Jeffrey Goldstone for mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking;
  • James Bjorken for scaling in QCD

Any other ideas?

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Nobel buzz 2007 « Symmetry factor - October 2, 2007

[…] they just want to show that the actual selection process is nothing of the above (after all, they totally got it wrong last year)? So far, their top three candidates […]

2. 2007 Nobel prize in physics goes to condensed matter « Symmetry factor - October 9, 2007

[…] Thompson Scientific confirmed its reputation for predicting it incorrectly. Now, to be fair, they did have Fert and Grunberg in contention for the 2006 Nobel […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: